TV Review: The Traitors

The Reality stars with our host Alan Cumming. (BTW you don’t actually need to know who the are or what show they were on to watch The Traitors.)

How many of you out there watched the first Knives Out movie? Well, I did, and it remains one of my all-time favorite movie mysteries of all time (as is The Glass Onion) — second only to Clue. In any case, do you recall the scene in the bar where Ransom (aka Chris Evans) feeds a bowl of beans to our heroine Marta (aka Ana de Armas) and then reminds her about the time they played Mafia? 

This episode, which happened well before the movie’s start, is the lynchpin of Knives Out and the writers did an excellent job explaining its significance to the audience. Even if, like me, you’d never heard of the game before.

Fast forward to the last day of the Premier League’s 2022-23 season (soccer), where I, unfortunately, watched Leicester City get relegated. After the match ended, I started flipping through the programs on Peacock, trying to take my mind off the Foxes’ uncertain future.

That’s when I ran across The Traitors

What initially sucked me in was Alan Cumming, whose work I’ve always enjoyed. So, without any expectations, I started the first episode…..Little did I know that I was about to watch a cutthroat game of Mafia (or Werewolf as it’s also known) played out for real money amongst some stunning scenery. 

And let me tell you, I am hooked.

The first season of the American version took twenty people, half reality show veterans, half ‘regular’ people, and whisked them off to a castle in Scotland. Where, after hanging out for a few hours, three people are selected to become Traitors whilst the rest of the group remain Faithfuls. 

The Faithful’s only job is to weed out the Traitors, and if they do so by the last episode — they split the prize pot betwixt them. However, if a Traitor remains undetected in their midsts, then the Traitor will win the entire pot, leaving the Faithfuls out in the cold.

Now, the Traitors’ don’t sit idly by, waiting to be sussed out. Each night, for one reason or another, they “murder” one of the Faithfuls. 

Alan Cumming, as the moderator of the game and, therefore, an agent of chaos in his own right, swans in and out of frame wearing a puckish smile and pulling off some absolutely fantastic fashion. 

The second best part of The Traitors (Alan Cumming’s being the very best) is the viewers know who is who from the outset. Allowing you to wince when a Traitor makes a critical mistake or shout at the TV as the Faithfuls vote out yet another Faithful.

There’s more to the show than just this — but I don’t want to ruin the surprises in store for you. Even better? The Traitors has been renewed for a second season! 

However, if you can’t wait, Peacock has the UK and Australian versions as well! I suggest watching the Australian version and then the UK — if you want to binge them all. Since both the UK and American versions are shot in the same castle and feature similar (but not the exact same) elements, the Australian version helps break things up.

Seriously, The Traitors is such a fun show. I cannot recommend it enough!

Aurora Teagarden Mysteries vs. Movies

I know this small admission won’t shock a single soul out there – I enjoy watching the Hallmark Mystery Channel (cozy mysteries in film form, basically). Most especially their original movie series like Mystery 101 (which features a college professor who teaches classes based on classic mystery novels, who uses this knowledge to consult on police cases), Chronicle Mysteries (which finds a true-crime podcast teaming up with a newspaper editor to solve cold-cases) and the Crossword Mysteries (which is about a crossword writer and a detective who team up from time to time). However, the ones I really enjoy watching are the Aurora Teagarden Mysteries, adapted from Charlaine Harris’s book series. 

A true-crime-loving librarian who happens to solve the occasional murder, I mean, what’s not to love about that? 

But here’s the thing…

Enjoying the movies as I did (and do), I decided to read the books and discovered (much to my delight) the films bore a striking resemblance to their paper counterparts. However, the movies do reconnoiter several characters and their backstories along with gently massaging the storylines. A phenomenon that happens in any adaptation and, in this particular case, is executed with a deft hand. 

However, much like the Agatha Raisen series by M.C. Beaton, which I first listened to on BBC radio (and then the audiobooks) – I eventually decided to dive into the written versions….and found myself disappointed by the text.

In the case of Agatha Raisen, Penelope Keith did (does) a delightful job in lending her voice to Agatha. In doing so, Keith makes Agatha’s snark and sarcasm shine rather than her bouts of misery, obsession, insecurity, and jealousy. Thus, making Agatha, a charming listen rather than (for me) a difficult read.

Similarly, Aurora’s unhappiness, waffling, and insecurities pervaded her point of view – and thus the entire story. As a result, the engaging mysteries, immersive settings, and interesting ancillary characters dull under the miasma of negativity and turned me away after plowing thru the third installment. 

Fortunately, this foray into the text didn’t blunt my enjoyment of the movies. Instead, it made me appreciate the skill of the screenwriters and actors (amongst them Candace Cameron Bure, Marilu Henner, Yannick Bisson, and Niall Matter) who brought the citizens and mysteries of Lawreceton to life in a way the books, for me, had not.  

Or perhaps I need the filter of brightly colors cloth, shelved books, and trees on the screen to connect with Aurora – hard to say. Either way, I’ve already got enough gloom floating around between my ears that taking on more, even fictional, is unappealing.

Hence my recommendation – if you enjoy reading mysteries tinged by a sense of glumness – these would be an excellent read for you. Otherwise, I would recommend watching the Hallmark movies starting at A Bone To Pick and working your way up to the latest Honeymoon, Honey Murder.

(I’d also recommend listening to the audiobooks of Agatha Raisen – they are fun!)

Tell Me No Lies & The Rook

Shelley Noble – Tell Me No Lies

Lady Dunbridge is back, and her second stab at detection doesn’t disappoint! Her reputation for being of assistance in a crisis is growing. So much so, that when a man is found murdered (and ignobly shoved into a laundry shute) after a debutante’s ball – the host comes to Phil (our Lady Dunbridge) for help.

One of the best things about these books (so far) is how seamlessly Noble has taken the traditional English Manor House mystery and plunked it down in historic NY City amongst; the Great Stock Market Crash of 1907, Teddy Roosevelt’s recent departure as the head of NY Police Commissioner’s Board (thus leaving a vacuum and allowing dirty cops free reign again), and the Gilded Age of the NY City elite (partying in full swing).

Well, those who didn’t lose their shirts in the aforementioned crash…

Another reason why I enjoy this burgeoning series is the number of mysteries Nobel packed betwixt the cover of her books!

Not only do we have the murder at hand to enjoy watching Lady Dunbrige solve…We also have the continuing mystery of Phil’s maid Lily. To whom Phil hasn’t a clue what her real name is, where she comes from or her history. What she does know is Lily keeps a stiletto strapped to her ankle at all times, knows her way around locks, and speaks several languages.

Lily’s worked hard under the supervision of Phil’s butler Preswick learning her new trade as a lady’s maid – but the question is, can Phil really trust Lily?

Then there’s MR. X, a man who Phil possesses even less data on than Lily (including what he looks like). However, it’s his motivations that are the true mystery. Why is he footing the bill for her year-long lease at the Plaza? Why does he want her at the ready should he need her talents (social position, connections, and brains) to help solve murders (so far…)? Even more important are they working on the same side of the law?

Both of these carried over questions, which Noble does a great job of dropping bread crumbs to keep her readers following her questionable characters, are only the tip of the iceberg of curious people and tangled motivates present in her two books.

If you enjoy nearly bloodless, fast-paced, smart, witty historical mysteries, you’ll find the Lady Dunbrige Mysteries well worth your time.

Though, as my colleague below has pointed out – you need to start with the first book first! Ask Me No Questions. Otherwise, the second installment won’t have nearly the depth of flavor!

the-rook

Now onto a Television Show Review!

If you perused our Best of the Decade book lists we compiled and published in January, then you know The Rook by Daniel O’Malley was at the top of my pile. So let me tell you I was really excited when I learned, back in May, STARZ had optioned it into a television series! (Unfortunately, because I’m disinclined to sign up for yet another streaming service, I had to wait until January before it became available on iTunes. Hence why I am reviewing it now.)

Here’s the thing.

(There’s always a thing with adaptations.)

When I first started watching The Rook, I needed to squint my eyes and look at it sideways to see the original text on the screen.

Not only does the show delete several beloved (well maybe not beloved but definitely interesting) Court members.

If you’re looking to see the Chevaliers Eckhart & Gubbins (metal manipulation & contortionist extraordinaire), Bishop Alrich (vampire) or Lord Wattleman (who sunk a submarine while naked in WWII and never had his powers really explained – that I recall) striding across the screen – you’ll be in for a disappointment.

It’s also missing the incidents with the purple spores & all the chanting, the cube of flesh bent on absorbing people, The Greek Woman, the dragon, a rabbit, and well quite a bit more besides.

The screen writes also futzed, which is a rather tame word for utterly reworked, the plot. Oh’ there’s still plenty of intrigues, infighting, and backstabbing – never fear.

But the villains of the piece have shifted dramatically.

To say the on-screen adaptation bears only a passing resemblance to the book and lacks much of the original wit and whimsy is an accurate assessment.

HOWEVER.

This is the thing.

If you think of books, television, movies, plays, and musicals as different universes – creating an artistic multiverse if you will – then it should be accepted that what happens in a book won’t translate exactly onto a television screen.

This is what happened with The Rook.

Both versions occupy different parts of the multiverse, and both versions contain strengths and flaws…

…and I love them both.

Much of what I love about the book is utterly impractical for a television (or computer) screen. If they’d tried, I fear we would’ve end up with something like The Hobbit. Where Peter Jackson used so much CGI, the movie felt more like a cartoon and lost a lot of the charm the original Lord of the Rings trilogy contained.

So the writers needed to edit, manipulate, and rework the plot.

And where they ended up is not only relevant, it shines a bright light on an under-addressed problem in the world today – Human Trafficking.

The specter haunting the Chequy employees isn’t the Grafters and their flesh manipulation techniques… But Vultures, like Peter Van Suoc, who hunt down and kidnap EVA’s (acronym for Extreme Variant Abilities). Then take them to the Lugate organization to be auctioned off to the highest bidder.

It makes sense. It’s compelling. It moves the story along. It is different.

Our other narrative mover and shaker Myfanwy Thomas – still wakes up in the rain surrounded by people wearing latex gloves, she still loses her memory, she still has a choice between the red & blue keys, she still writes her new self letters and she still pursues the questions of who she is & who stole her memory.

Perhaps the television version is bleaker than its counterpart in the book universe – but is that such a bad thing? The adaptation strays much farther into grey areas than the book ever did. Mainly by asking the question – what really separates the Vultures & Lugate from the Chequy at the end of the day?

So if you can wrap your mind around an artistic multiverse, I would highly suggest watching The Rook. Not only is the story compelling – but watching the treatment Gestalt received at the hands of both the writers and the actors – is brilliant.

Seriously.

False Values & Nancy Drew

Ben Aaronovitch – False Value

Okay, I must confess…

I’ve fallen behind in the ‘Rivers Of London’ series. Not because of the writing, but due to the space between my ears and I’ve only recently been able to start reading books set after the 1950s.

And, for reasons beyond my ken, I decided to pick the series back up after missing the last two books. Yeah, I know. However, I think its the sign of a good author that the reader can restart a series – after missing one or two installments – and not be confused about what’s going on.

And Ben Aaronovitch is an excellent author.

I can admit, I was a hair confused for the first three chapters – but I think it was more out of concern for Peter Grant than the writing itself. I should’ve had more faith in my author and resisted the urge to check the last page or two to see if my faves were together again!

That being said – this was a great book! Peter Grant providing security for a tech company? I mean, he gets distracted enough without a bevy of unique vending machines to sample his way thru, board games to play, and killer drones to deal with!

This book is one of the most interesting transition books I’ve read in a long time, giving you hints, crumbs of new allies? New Baddies? And inklings of new stresses coming soon to his home life…

If you’ve never read the ‘Rivers of London’ Series before, I think you can start with False Value and be alright – keeping in mind, there are a number of books that come before it. (However, I would suggest going back and starting with number 1 – because who doesn’t enjoy a police procedural with magic?)

Nancy Drew

Question, have you ever tried going back a rereading a series you loved and adored as a child? Only to find your adult eyes can’t see past some glaring flaws your younger self missed? This same thing happened to me when I tried going back and reread Nancy Drew. I did manage to wade my way through my favorites, but the vast majority I needed to set aside, so my memory and love of them wouldn’t tarnish.

The preponderance of coincidences abounding in the mysteries was my biggest problem with the books. My second was the seemingly flawless nature of Nancy herself, and because she’s written as the quintessential daughter/friend/sleuth, she lacks the nuance I crave as an adult.

All this being said – I still couldn’t help myself from watching the first episode of the new television show.

I mean its Nancy Drew, how could I not?

So I watched the first episode – and found myself tilting my head going, “Ummm…..Guys? Are you sure this is what you really meant to do?”

But in the name of research, I download episode number 2….then 3….and 4…..by the 5th I was hooked and bought the whole series.

Why? Because the show’s clever in how it skirts around my two biggest grievances of the books. First, the writers added a supernatural element. Ghosts, spirits, and corporally challenged beings roam Horseshoe Bay. Which doesn’t sound like it ought to work – but it does. This supernatural element takes away our sleuth’s reliance on coincidences and happenstance to solve crimes. Instead it gives Nancy and her friends a different, eerier, avenue of investigation which they use. (After they start believing that supernatural beings are in fact in play.)

My other issue, the lack of depth, is also addressed – because neither Nancy or any of her friends are flawless in this adaptation. For example, Nancy’s mother dies less than a year before the series begins. It’s at this point we meet Nancy Drew. Still angry. Still grieving. Still in a tailspin that’s trashed not only chance at a college career but created a deep rift dividing her and her father, Carson Drew.

Nancy’s life is complicated, messy, and her need to expose the truth costs Nancy dearly – but she wouldn’t have it any other way.

The tv show itself isn’t without its issues. Owing mainly to the fact the majority (but by no means all) of characters are around eighteen – you get a fair bit of interpersonal drama. Which did, in the beginning, have me rolling my eyes saying, dude is this really necessary for the plot?

Turns out, yes, yes it is. So roll your eyes, throw popcorn at the tv – but keep watching! Because there are so many delicious layers to this show, so many reveals to be made – I promise you will get hooked!